FirePro M4000 vs GeForce 920M
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce 920M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and GeForce 920M.
FirePro M4000 and GeForce 920M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and GeForce 920M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
GeForce 920M
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
33 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 33 Watt.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 920M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce 920M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 920M - in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 920M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 354 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 and GeForce 920M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2700 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
1−2
medium / 1080p
9−10
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
140−150
60−65
medium / 768p
120−130
27−30
ultra / 1080p
55−60
7−8
QHD / 1440p
30−35
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
90−95
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
65−70
10−11
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−11
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 720p
65−70
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
low / 768p
55−60
18−20
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
7−8
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 920M.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
27−30
0−1
medium / 768p
18−20
−
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 920M.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
GeForce 920M
Architecture
GCN
Kepler
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
N16V-GM-S
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
27 January 2015
Pipelines
512
384
Core clock speed
600 MHz
954 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
30.53
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
297.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
n/a
PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
40 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price