FirePro W5100 vs GeForce 920M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W5100 and GeForce 920M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce 920M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W5100
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce 920M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 51% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 920M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce 920M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 920M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 920M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 24 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce 920M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 475% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 920M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce 920M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | N16V-GM-S |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 27 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 954 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 30.53 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 40 Mh/s |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |