GeForce 920A vs GeForce 920M
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others GeForce 920M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce 920M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 33 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 920M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce 920M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 920M - with Kepler.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 202 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce 920M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208B | N16V-GM-S |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 27 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 954 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 30.53 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |