GeForce 920M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When comparing GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 650, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 920M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than GeForce 920M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−33
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
150−160
medium / 768p
27−30
120−130
ultra / 1080p
7−8
60−65
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
65−70
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 920M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
20−22
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce 920M.
Full Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N16V-GM-S
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2015
3 January 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
954 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
55.20
Floating-point performance
297.6 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price