GeForce 920M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 655, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920M stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 655, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M or Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 920M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
60−65
190−200
medium / 768p
27−30
160−170
ultra / 1080p
7−8
85−90
QHD / 1440p
−
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
10−11
85−90
ultra / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
85−90
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
low / 768p
18−20
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
45−50
medium / 768p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 920M.
Full Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N16V-GM-S
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2015
1 September 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
954 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
50.40
Floating-point performance
297.6 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price