GeForce 920M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU

When comparing GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce 920M Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU Check Price

GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M or Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:

GeForce 920M Laptops

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 920M	Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	90−95
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−105
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 920M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 920M	Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	N16V-GM-S	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	27 January 2015	28 May 2019
Pipelines	384	64
Core clock speed	954 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	40 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Quick Sync		+
GPU Boost	2.0
GameWorks	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 920M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU

GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares