GeForce 920M vs P106 090
In this comparison between GeForce 920M and P106 090 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920M will be the best choice, for others P106 090 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M | P106 090 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 090 has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 400 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 6208 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 920M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920M | P106 090 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N16V-GM-S | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 27 January 2015 | 31 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 73.49 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |