GeForce 920M vs Quadro 4000M
In this comparison between GeForce 920M and Quadro 4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920M will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920M and Quadro 4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 920M and Quadro 4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M or Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce 920M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 479 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce 920M is 600 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
14−16
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
0−1
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 920M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
low / 768p
0−1
16−18
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 920M.
Full Specs
GeForce 920M
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Code name
N16V-GM-S
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
27 January 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
384
336
Core clock speed
954 MHz
475 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
26.60
Floating-point performance
297.6 gflops
638.4 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price
