GeForce 920M vs Quadro CX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920M and Quadro CX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920M stacks up against Quadro CX, check out specs charts below.
Quadro CX
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920M | Quadro CX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 352 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 920M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920M | Quadro CX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N16V-GM-S | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |