GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between GeForce 920M and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 157% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 920M and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 920M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N16V-GM-S | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 27 January 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |