GeForce 920M vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing GeForce 920M and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920M and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 A375
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 54 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce 920M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920M is 1796 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 92% more, than GeForce 920M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16V-GM-S | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 27 January 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 920M vs Quadro K1000M
- GeForce 920M vs Radeon HD 4810
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro K1000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 4810
- GeForce 920M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce 920M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M