FirePro S7150 vs GeForce 920MX
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and GeForce 920MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 920MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce 920MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 16 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 837% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 920MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 920MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce 920MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 45 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and GeForce 920MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 180% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro S7150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 920MX. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce 920MX | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tonga | N16V-GMR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 25 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 965 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 23.83 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 602.1 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |