FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 920MX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce 920MX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against GeForce 920MX, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 920MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 16 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1306% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 920MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 920MX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 920MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 140 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 920MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce 920MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 920MX | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | N16V-GMR |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 25 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 23.83 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 602.1 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |