GeForce 920MX vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
When comparing GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 460 v2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920MX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 900% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920MX has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 186 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 920MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2208 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 44% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 75% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce 920MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920MX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | N16V-GMR | GF114 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 March 2015 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 256 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 779 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |