GeForce 920MX vs GeForce GTX 760A
In this comparison between GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 760A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920MX will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 760A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 243% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 760A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 337 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 760A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2208 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GK106 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 628 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |