GeForce 920MX vs GRID M10 8Q
When comparing GeForce 920MX and GRID M10 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920MX and GRID M10 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 1306% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID M10 8Q are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 68 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3400 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920MX and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 62% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 271% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |