GeForce 920MX vs GRID M60 2Q
In this comparison between GeForce 920MX and GRID M60 2Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920MX will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 2Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920MX | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 1306% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID M60 2Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 408 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 180% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GRID M60 2Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 920MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920MX | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N16V-GMR | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 256 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |