GeForce 920MX vs GRID M60 8Q
When choosing between GeForce 920MX and GRID M60 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920MX and GRID M60 8Q.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1306% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 408 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 237% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 471% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |