GeForce 920MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce 920MX and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920MX will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920MX and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 920MX and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920MX
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
16 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 181% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 765 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce 920MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce 920MX.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce 920MX.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce 920MX and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
160−170
medium / 768p
95−100
130−140
ultra / 1080p
40−45
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce 920MX.
low / 768p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than GeForce 920MX.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 920MX.
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
−
low / 720p
50−55
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than GeForce 920MX.
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than GeForce 920MX.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
5−6
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than GeForce 920MX.
high / 1080p
1−2
6−7
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
6−7
18−20
medium / 1080p
3−4
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce 920MX.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce 920MX.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce 920MX.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce 920MX.
low / 768p
12−14
30−35
medium / 768p
9−10
21−24
high / 1080p
4−5
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce 920MX.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce 920MX.
Full Specs
GeForce 920MX
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N16V-GMR
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
25 March 2015
5 June 2013
Pipelines
256
40
Core clock speed
965 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
23.83
52.00
Floating-point performance
602.1 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price