GeForce 920MX vs Radeon Pro W5500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920MX and Radeon Pro W5500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920MX and Radeon Pro W5500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920MX | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 431% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce 920MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920MX and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 920MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920MX | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N16V-GMR | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 March 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 256 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |