GeForce 920MX vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between GeForce 920MX and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920MX will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 525% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 35 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce 920MX and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 733% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 788% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 188% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M6. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 1175% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 487% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 750% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 377% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 800% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1028% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |