GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
In this comparison between GeForce 930A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 930A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 930A
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 51% more power consumption, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - in Laptops.
- GeForce 930A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 107 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 7998 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 357% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce 930A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 930A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | GM108 | N18P-G62 Max-Q |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 April 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 76.80 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 7.5 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTS 450
- GeForce 930A vs Radeon HD 6770
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTS 450
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 6770
- GeForce 930A vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960