GeForce 930A vs GeForce MX250
When choosing between GeForce 930A and GeForce MX250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 930A and GeForce MX250.
GeForce 930A
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930A | GeForce MX250 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 930A has 230% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce 930A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX250 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 930A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 590 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 4998 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 930A and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 105% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930A | GeForce MX250 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | GM108 | N17S-G2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 20 February 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 1518 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 24.91 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 6.1 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |