GeForce 930A vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When choosing between GeForce 930A and Iris Plus Graphics 655, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 930A and Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce 930A
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 930A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce 930A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 930A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 930A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930A is 628 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce 930A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 930A and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 100% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GM108 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |