GeForce 930M vs GeForce GTX 280
In this comparison between GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 930M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 280 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce 930M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930M | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 236 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 615% more power consumption, than GeForce 930M.
- GeForce 930M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 280 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 930M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce 930M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 280 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 930M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 368 MHz higher, than GeForce 930M.
- GeForce 930M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 930M is 693 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 930M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930M | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GM-B/S, N16S-LP | GT200 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 1296 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 48.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1107 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 84 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |