GeForce 930M vs GRID K260Q
When comparing GeForce 930M and GRID K260Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 930M and GRID K260Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
GeForce 930M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 930M.
- GeForce 930M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 930M and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 930M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 930M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930M is 183 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 930M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 930M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GM-B/S, N16S-LP | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 84 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |