FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 930MX
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce 930MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 930MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce 930MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 930MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 930MX has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 930MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 930MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 237 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce 930MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce 930MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Fortnite is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 930MX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | N16S-GMR |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 10 March 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 952 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 24.48 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 783.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |