FirePro S7000 vs GeForce 930MX
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce 930MX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and GeForce 930MX.
FirePro S7000
GeForce 930MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930MX here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce 930MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 17 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 1958% more power consumption, than GeForce 930MX.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 930MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 930MX.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 930MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 930MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 2 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce 930MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 930MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 262% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 178% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 215% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 288% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce 930MX. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce 930MX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | N16S-GMR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 10 March 2016 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 952 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 24.48 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 783.4 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |