GeForce 930MX vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 930MX and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 930MX and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
GeForce 930MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930MX | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 1223% more power consumption, than GeForce 930MX.
- GeForce 930MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 930MX and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 930MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 930MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 207 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 930MX and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 930MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 930MX and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 57% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 137% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 158% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930MX | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GMR | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |