GeForce 930MX vs GRID M6 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce 930MX and GRID M6 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 930MX will be the best choice, for others GRID M6 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
GeForce 930MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930MX | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 488% more power consumption, than GeForce 930MX.
- GeForce 930MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 930MX.
- GeForce 930MX is used in Laptops, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 930MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 230 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GeForce 930MX and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce 930MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 73% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 150% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 193% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930MX | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GMR | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 722 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 | 69.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |