FirePro W7170M vs GeForce 940A
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7170M and GeForce 940A. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7170M and GeForce 940A. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 940A
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GeForce 940A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W7170M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 940A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 940A - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GeForce 940A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940A is 306 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and GeForce 940A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 344% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GeForce 940A | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | GM108 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |