GeForce 940A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940A stacks up against GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 940A
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 51% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - in Laptops.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 6 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 7998 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce 940A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | GM108 | N18P-G62 Max-Q |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 April 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 76.80 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 7.5 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 940A vs GeForce GT 745A
- GeForce 940A vs Radeon HD 5750
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GT 745A
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 5750
- GeForce 940A vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce 940A vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960