GeForce 940A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce 940A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940A will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 940A
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940A is 829 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce 940A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 940A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce 940A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GM108 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 940A vs GeForce GT 745A
- GeForce 940A vs Radeon HD 5750
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 745A
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 5750
- GeForce 940A vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce 940A vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book