GeForce 940A vs Radeon Pro 5300M
When choosing between GeForce 940A and Radeon Pro 5300M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 940A and Radeon Pro 5300M.
GeForce 940A
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940A | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 5300M has 157% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5300M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
- GeForce 940A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 9998 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce 940A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940A | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | GM108 | Navi 14 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 100.0 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |