GeForce 940A vs Radeon R9 M395X
In this comparison between GeForce 940A and Radeon R9 M395X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 940A
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 657% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940A is 306 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- GeForce 940A and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940A is 752 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 372% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 385% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 240% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 375% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 231% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 275% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 444% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce 940A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3 |
Code name | GM108 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |