FirePro S7000 vs GeForce 940M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce 940M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against GeForce 940M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce 940M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 366% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 940M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce 940M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 940M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 122 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce 940M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 425% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce 940M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 114% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce 940M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N16S-GT-S/B |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 12 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 28.22 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 101 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |