FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 940M
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and GeForce 940M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 940M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce 940M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 940M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 940M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce 940M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 447 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce 940M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940M is 14 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce 940M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce 940M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 6% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce 940M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce 940M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce 940M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | N16S-GT-S/B |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 12 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 28.22 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |