FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 940M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce 940M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce 940M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 940M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 940M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce 940M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 940M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 247 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 940M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 214% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 940M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | N16S-GT-S/B |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 12 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 28.22 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |