GeForce 940M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940M and GeForce GTX 460 v2, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940M stacks up against GeForce GTX 460 v2, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 293 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 940M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2008 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 160% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 75% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 142% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | GF114 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 24 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 779 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 43.62 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |