GeForce 940M vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce 940M and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 940M and GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 327 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 940M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 24% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 56% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |