GeForce 940M vs GRID K520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 940M and GRID K520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 940M and GRID K520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 327 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce 940M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 312% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |