GeForce 940M vs Quadro 7000
When choosing between GeForce 940M and Quadro 7000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 940M and Quadro 7000.
Quadro 7000
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | Quadro 7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 172% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 421 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- GeForce 940M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 1404 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 255% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | Quadro 7000 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | GF110 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 2 May 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 41.66 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |