GeForce 940M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
When comparing GeForce 940M and Radeon HD 4850 X2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 447 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- GeForce 940M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940M is 10 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| GeForce 940M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| GeForce 940M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Fortnite is 10% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| GeForce 940M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in Minecraft is 1% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| GeForce 940M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | R700 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |