GeForce 940M vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between GeForce 940M and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 515 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce 940M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 760% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 812% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 940M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 633% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 321% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 780% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 814% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |