GeForce 940M vs Tesla T4
When comparing GeForce 940M and Tesla T4, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940M and Tesla T4 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla T4
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 940M has 7% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 487 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce 940M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 940M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |