FirePro S7150 vs GeForce 940MX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7150 and GeForce 940MX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce 940MX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7150
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GeForce 940MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 552% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 940MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 940MX.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce 940MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 202 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and GeForce 940MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 264% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GeForce 940MX | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | N16S-GTR-B/S |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 10 March 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1122 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 23.83 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |