FirePro S9000 vs GeForce 940MX
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce 940MX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and GeForce 940MX.
FirePro S9000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce 940MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 23 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 1421% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 940MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 940MX.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 940MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 222 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce 940MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 264% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce 940MX. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce 940MX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | N16S-GTR-B/S |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 10 March 2016 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1122 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 23.83 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 102 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |