FirePro V5800 vs GeForce 940MX
When comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce 940MX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce 940MX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 940MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 221% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 940MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 940MX has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 940MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 432 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 940MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 and GeForce 940MX is 4000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce 940MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce 940MX have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce 940MX have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 940MX | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Juniper | N16S-GTR-B/S |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 10 March 2016 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1122 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 23.83 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |