GeForce 820A vs GeForce 940MX
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and GeForce 940MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others GeForce 940MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce 940MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 23 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 940MX has 53% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 940MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 940MX has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940MX - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 940MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 347 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A and GeForce 940MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 257% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 148% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce 940MX | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GF117 | N16S-GTR-B/S |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 10 March 2016 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1122 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 23.83 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |