GeForce 940MX vs GeForce GT 745A
When choosing between GeForce 940MX and GeForce GT 745A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 940MX and GeForce GT 745A.
GeForce GT 745A
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GeForce GT 745A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 745A has 43% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GT 745A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940MX has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and GeForce GT 745A - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GT 745A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 285 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce 940MX and GeForce GT 745A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940MX and GeForce GT 745A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 33% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GeForce GT 745A | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 26 August 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 29.28 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 642.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | 26 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |